Since Mr. Andreessen has been an eBay insider, he has engaged in several transactions that lead us to question his loyalty to eBay. During Mr. Andreessen’s time on the eBay Board he has purchased large stakes in two former eBay subsidiaries, reaping significant personal riches. In September 2009, an investor group that included Mr. Andreessen, preempted a planned Skype IPO (in which stockholders would have ended up making multiple billions of dollars) and bought 70% of Skype for less than what eBay had paid to acquire it(1). Mr. Andreessen basked in the purchase, saying that “Skype is the archetypal phenomenon: a breakthrough technology”(2). His partner was even more excited, stating that “Skype is on its way to becoming one of the most important companies in the world”(2). One cannot help but wonder what happened to Mr. Andreessen’s fiduciary responsibility to share his feelings with Mr. Donahoe and the board rather than preempt the planned IPO to further his own interests. A mere 18 months later, Mr. Andreessen’s investor group flipped Skype to Microsoft for $8.5 billion, a value three times what they paid for it(3), netting approximately $4 billion(3) at the expense of eBay stockholders. After the sale to Microsoft, Mr. Andreessen, a sitting eBay Board member and fiduciary to stockholders, stated: “one reason we were enthusiastic about buying Skype was that even though we thought it would be a tremendous standalone business, we also knew that for Microsoft and a number of other companies Skype would be an obvious thing to buy. We knew we’d always have the fall-back of selling to strategic buyers”(4). Did Mr. Andreessen share this strong view with Mr. Donahoe? Was Mr. Donahoe completely asleep, or even worse, so naive and deferential to his “world-class board”(5) that he allowed a sitting board member and several private equity firms to walk away with over $4 billion in what was essentially stockholder’s money after a sale to a strategic that he obviously should have orchestrated himself? Many others have been vocally critical of the Skype transaction(2,6), but, until now, none have taken on the task of standing up to Mr. Donahoe and this board.
Mr. Andreessen’s next eBay sourced grand slam was his investment in Kynetic. In March 2011, as part of eBay’s $2.4 billion acquisition of GSI Commerce, the eBay Board decided they no longer wanted the Kynetic portion of GSI Commerce and sold it back to the company’s founder for just $31 million in cash and a $467 million sellers note at below market interest.(7,8) In June 2012, Mr. Andreessen pounced, making a $150 million investment in Kynetic at a $1.5 billion valuation, leveraging the low sale price and below market financing which the eBay Board had recently approved.(9) Just a year later, Kynetic was valued at $3.1 billion, giving Mr. Andreessen a paper gain of more than 100%.(10)
Additionally, during Mr. Andreessen’s time on the eBay Board – a time when he has been privy to nonpublic eBay Board information – he has made investments in and actively advised, no less than five direct competitors of eBay (four of which are competitors of PayPal), including Boku (mobile payments platform), Coinbase (Bitcoin wallet), Dwolla (secure online money management), Jumio (online and mobile credit card payments) and Fab (design e-commerce)(11). How can Mr. Donahoe and the eBay Board allow Mr. Andreessen to advise these competitors while he simultaneously possesses not only nonpublic eBay Board information but also intimate proprietary information about PayPal’s operations?But perhaps more importantly, how can Mr. Andreessen be trusted to objectively advise Mr. Donahoe and the eBay Board about the strategic direction of PayPal when he has vested interest in so many of its competitors? Regarding Square, another powerful PayPal competitor, Mr. Andreessen publicly lamented his regret in passing on the opportunity to invest in that company as well.-from Carl Icahn’s Open Letter to eBay Shareholders
Linkfest:Feb 25,2014
Some stuff that I am reading today morning:
Warren Buffett:What you can learn from my real estate investments (Fortune)
India Inc’s cheese has moved (FirstBiz)
Frantic fare wars amongst airlines (Mint)
NTPC in shock (ET)
Stop the lies about parenting (BL)
Here comes the climax (TRB)
Best Term Insurance Plans in India (BasuNivesh)
5 Must Know rules before opening a PPF account for kids (JagoInvestor)
Follow the gold (WashingtonPost)
The two most important questions for investors (CiovaccoCapital)
Why Sequoia’s WhatsApp Investment is so impressive (Robgo)
Whats App:Message Understood?
“Most people do not realise how difficult the ice cream industry is. It is capital-intensive in nature with a long gestation period,” he says morosely. Top that up with a mediocre 2-3% net profit margin that most players in this industry, including Vadilal, bring to the table and the result isn’t as sweet as you’d expect. “It is so challenging that there is not too much money available to the promoters,” says Gandhi with a wry smile. What is available, though, is far from insubstantial — Gandhi’s income is not restricted to just his salary or dividend from the approximately 22% stake he holds in Vadilal Industries. “There is also some money that comes through partnership firms and royalty from the Vadilal brand,” he says, without giving away details.
And most of it, since the early 1980s, has been invested in land. More precisely, agricultural land. “People might think this is an unconventional kind of investment but it is one that has worked for the family. It started off as an experiment the first time and now this is a big part of our personal portfolio,” he says. It certainly is: land accounts for 80% of the Gandhi family portfolio, with the rest distributed in more predictable avenues such as FDs or cash, with equity being the smallest component. “Equity is a volatile investment and my mindset is not in line with that. Land is more stable and offers a steady return,” rationalises Gandhi
Gandhi’s views are just reflective of the state of the market that we find ourselves in: over the past five years, the Sensex has just about managed to yield around 16% return. As for the other asset classes, the recent National Spot Exchange fiasco has taken the sheen off commodities, while volatility has left investors with marked-to-market losses in fixed income as yields suddenly spiked when foreign investors pulled out money from the debt market. Against such a backdrop, the preference for real estate has continued, despite concerns of a bubble building up in the sector.
In the case of the Gandhis, at any point in time, the family owns at least 100 acres of agricultural land in Gujarat, at places such as Gota, Bardoli and Bavla. “We have sold about 10% of our holding to date for a reasonable return,” says Gandhi. “Reasonable” here is defined as 1.5 times the number of years the asset has been owned; that is, land held over a five-year period has given a return of close to eight times. The 10% that was sold was in the form of plots of 400-500 sq yards, apart from 15 fully constructed bungalows. Gandhi is no hurry to monetise the rest of his land holding. “It is not just about making money right away. This allows us the option of possibly looking at an area like property development at a later date. We want to keep our options open,” he says.
Gandhi is only one of the many wealthy entrepreneurs Outlook Business spoke with who were convinced of the merits of real estate, in one form or the other. Consider CK Ranganathan. “In the long run, I am convinced no asset class can beat real estate,” says the chairman and managing director of the Rs 1,000-crore FMCG rising star, CavinKare. As much as 95% of his personal wealth is in real estate, where Ranganathan prefers buying land to residential or commercial buildings. “Land offers the best returns,” he declares. The tilt towards this asset class came after he tried investing in stocks, financial instruments and commodities between 2005 and 2007. After the 2008 meltdown, the 52-year-old Ranganathan recalled his grandparents’ advice to him as a youngster. “They always advised me to buy land, and I decided that was the best thing to do. Asset allocation changed from 50% in stocks in 2007-08 to 95% in real estate,” he goes on to say. The remaining 5% is divided between gold and stocks.-from OutlookBusiness