Telugu filmdom is now full of tales about how Dasari Narayana Rao, who had fallen on hard times financially, suddenly seemed flush with money after he became MoS for coal and mines in 2004. “Dasari used to stay in Prashasan Nagar in a police officer’s house on rent,” says another filmmaker, refusing to be named. “He could not pay his dues for 10 months. This was in 2002. He was in such debt that every hour he’d receive calls from financiers and lenders asking for amounts ranging from a lakh to a crore.
Dasari owned a school in Chennai opposite Prasad Studios and was to sell it to Vazhapadi Ramamurthy, a politician, in 2001 in order to recover some money. But after Dasari took an advance, Vazhapadi passed away and the sale was called off,” he says. About a month after he became Union minister in 2004, Dasari called financiers to his place and settled dues worth Rs 3.75 crore. “They were all stunned because he was literally subsisting on hand loans at the time. But they were glad to get their money back,” says a film distributor.
Overnight, Dasari seemed to have come into big money and bought distribution rights for big films such as Jai Chiranjeeva (starring Chiranjeevi), Sainikudu (Mahesh Babu), Super (Nagarjuna), Balu ABCDEFG (Pawan Kalyan), Desam Muduru (Allu Arjun). “He spent Rs 6 crore to buy the distribution rights of Jai Chiranjeeva for Nizam and Vizag areas and the movie tanked. But his company was strangely making profits,” says a director. “This way, Dasari bought rights for 40 big films soon after becoming minister. Where were the funds coming from unless it suddenly rained money in his native hometown Palakolu (West Godavari) district,” says the director.-from Outlook
Author: Raoji
Categories
Weekend Mega Linkfest:Nov 16,2013
Some off beat reads for the weekend:
Thailand and Cambodia fight over a Shiva temple (Economist)
Are Kashmiri Shias the next Pandits? (Tehelka)
Coaldust on them whites (Outlook)
Upper caste India’s debt to Dr.Ambedkar (Caravan)
HDFC Mutual Fund unwavered by recent failures (Forbes)
Coming soon Satya 7 (Open)
How to make proxy war succeed in Baluchistan (IDR)
It costs atleast $30,000 to climb Mount Everest (Smithsonian)
Love in the time of Bollywood (ForeignAffairs)
Obama’s credibility gap (Slate)
Photos:The great mansions of Manhattan (VanityFair)
Apple cores are a myth (Atlantic)
My Sachin Story (GreatBong)
Zomato-Two sides of a coin (Rodinhoods)
Travelogue:Chail (Ghumakkar)
As elections head closer, explosive news will become the norm.Presenting the latest “expose”/”dirty trick” against the BJP’s Saheb.
Now awaiting the video of Rahul Gandhi’s activities when abroad.
After watching this video, I am quite impressed with Amit Shah’s meticulous and diligent follow-ups.Feel he would make a great Central Home Minister !!
R Jagannathan in an interesting article in FirstPost makes a case that “Mumbai property is a sell rather than a buy”
After making his case, he ends with a disclaimer:
Disclosure: I am currently acting contrary to my views above for personal reasons. I am in the market right now for a small property since I plan to live in it after about a year
Sirjee, if your own actions are contrary to your own views, aren’t you being a hypocrite by telling your readers to act on your views?
But I digress.Let’s look at why R Jagannathan thinks Mumbai realty is a sell:
1.Very few transactions are happening at these price levels
2.Rental yields are absurdly low…investors can get better returns from savings deposits
3.Gap between affordability, investor returns and quoted prices will ultimately have to be closed.Property prices will have to crash by a third to a half to make that happen.
While R Jagannathan has his facts right,his conclusions are incorrect.His own biases makes him such a poor realty investor as written in this earlier piece:
I remember I had bought a home in Thane (a satellite city of Mumbai) in 1997, and for the next few years not only did the price not rise, it actually fell 20 percent. It was only after six to eight years that the price stabilised and started rising consistently. Now, despite what builders tell us, prices are again levelling off. If I had bought my small flat just for appreciation, I would have lost money in the initial years. Even a bank fixed deposit would have doubled my money in those six to eight years.
What R Jagannathan does not get about Mumbai realty is the motivations and incentives of the people who are involved in it.Lets consider each one of the stakeholder involved:
1.Builder:Wants to get the building developed fast.Sells flats in pre-launch phase to financiers/investors to garner funds quickly for building the project.Once 40% of the project is sold, his holding power increases tremendously and he can wait for years to get his price.
2.Financier-Lends money to builder.Takes flats as collateral.Interested in return of capital and quick project completion
3.Investor-Does not lend money.Buys flats in pre-launch phase at a discount.In this phase, many times the approvals are not obtained from the concerned authorities.He sells immediately after project completion.Builders want their relationship with such investors to be good…so the builder always tries to ensure that the investor in pre-launch phase is rewarded in the form of higher prices for his trust/loyalty to the builder.
4.End User-Intends to use the flat for self use or rentals.Time horizon to hold the flat is similar to that of gold.Many plan to live in the flats till alive.Often, wives/children will not allow to sell flat even if a good offer comes.
Also, Indians understand instinctively that real assets will increase with time due to persistent inflation. In all metros,cost of land,approvals,speed money charges,cement,steel,interiors,labour,capital etc have increased exponentially.
It is inconceivable that a project built 5 years from now in any metro can be built at a cost cheaper than current levels.
Now lets look afresh at R Jagannathan’s arguments why Mumbai realty is a sell:
1.Very few transactions are happening at these price levels
The market will find its own equilibrium.Does not mean that a crash is imminent or is inevitable
2.Rental yields are absurdly low…investors can get better returns from savings deposits
Dividend yields for blue chip stocks are around 1% .Does that make them a sell?
3.Gap between affordability, investor returns and quoted prices will ultimately have to be closed.Property prices will have to crash by a third to a half to make that happen.
Has already happened for commercial realty which has different supply-demand dynamics.No chance of such huge corrections for residential realty owing to tremendous latent demand
Now my humble submission to R Jagannathan is this:
If you still had your Thane flat now, it would have given you better returns than fixed deposits and equities.And you wouldn’t be looking for a roof over your head at this age.