This is not correct sir; some spurious data and chart for random sensalization. GE is lost more wealth in past decade after growing dramatically in the 90s……There are nearly 2500+ active stocks in US currently and if u account for all legacy names and remove survivorship bias the story is much different. Many innovative US firms across sectors have created 100 baggers over past 40 + years …..
One reply on “Just 4%”
This is not correct sir; some spurious data and chart for random sensalization. GE is lost more wealth in past decade after growing dramatically in the 90s……There are nearly 2500+ active stocks in US currently and if u account for all legacy names and remove survivorship bias the story is much different. Many innovative US firms across sectors have created 100 baggers over past 40 + years …..