Categories
This is India !

The Cop who writes to himself

This post is in continuation of This is India ! Series (see here)

In Bangalore, a senior police official has been writing letters to himself for over two months. On 1 July, Bhaskar Rao, the Inspector General of Police (IGP) of Karnataka Police’s Internal Security Division (ISD) was given the additional charge of the Training Department. Ever since, whenever interaction between the two departments is required, Rao writes an official letter to himself in the other department.

His two offices are located in different parts of the city, the ISD office on Richmond Road and the Training Department on Palace Road. After Rao writes a letter to himself as IGP, ISD, he visits his Palace Road office to respond to it. Two days after this news appeared in a city newspaper, he is unable to understand why his actions have been found odd. “This is not a corporate office where, as the head of two departments, I can just take a decision. Here, a procedure needs to be followed,” he says. Rao adds that when he is relieved of the Training Department, such correspondence will keep his successor abreast of pending work.

There is a shortage of high-level officers in the Karnataka Police. Apart from Rao, a number of other officers also have dual posts. For instance, Rao points out, the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Law and Order, MN Reddy, also has the additional charge of ADGP, Railways. So far, Rao says, he has written about 15 letters to himself.

One of his recent letters as IGP, ISD, was about how the Karnataka State Industrial Security Force needed to be allotted dates for training. Occasionally, despite the letters to himself, delays occur. Rao says this is because of the lower machinery in his departments. He explains, “Sometimes, although as the Training head I sanction a date for a force’s training, I later learn from my ISD men that no preparations have been made for it.” Then, he has to use strong language for himself in the Training Department. Rao writes a letter “expressing displeasure” with the IGP, Training. “I then go to the Training office to receive the letter and pull up the officers responsible,” he says.-from Open

Categories
This is India !

Anil Ambani does not recall

This post is in continuation of my This is India ! Series

Reliance ADAG Group Chairman Anil Ambani today told a special CBI court hearing 2G spectrum case that he was not even aware of a company called Swan Telecom Private limited (STPL).

 

I am not aware of any company by the name of Swan Telecom Limited. Reliance Telecom Limited is a subsidiary of Reliance Communication Limited and I am a non-executive chairman of the latter company. Earlier, I was on the board of Reliance Telecom Limited, but I do not recall the period. I am unable to recall if I was on the board of this company in 2007,” Ambani told the court.

Confronted by the prosecution with his earlier statement to the CBI, Ambani told the court, “It is wrong to suggest that Swan Telecom Pvt Ltd (STPL) was a shell company of my group. It is wrong to suggest that it was in my knowledge that STPL had applied for UAS Licence for J&K service area in 2007. I cannot recall if Reliance Telecom had made an investment to the extent of 9.9 per cent in equity shares in STPL.”

“I am unable to recall if Reliance Telecom had applied an investment in preference shares of STPL of Re. 1 each with premium of Rs. 999 per share, totaling to Rs. 1000 per share. I cannot say if this investment in equity and preference shares was made to show that the company was compliant with UASL Guidelines. It is wrong to suggest that these facts were discussed with me by Gautam Doshi,” he said.

I am unable to recall if these facts were told by me to the investigating officer. It is wrong to suggest that it was in my knowledge that STPL had applied for UAS licences in thirteen more service areas. It is wrong to suggest that it was in my knowledge that for applying for more service areas, the company required higher paid-up capital and higher net worth.”

“It is wrong to suggest that for this purpose Reliance Telecom Ltd (RTL) purchased further preference shares of Re. 1 at a premium of Rs. 999 from STPL and this was done to maintain net worth criteria. It is further wrong to suggest that it was in my knowledge that it was done so that the investment of RTL remains 9.9 per cent,” he said.

His stock answer to a series of questions by the prosecution on the existence of companies, board meetings he attended and transfer of his shares to companies such as Tiger Traders, Zebra Consultants and Parrot consultants were, “I’m not aware” or “I don’t recall”.

from Firstpost

Categories
This is India ! Tweets

Guess who’s collecting hafta?

Categories
Realty This is India !

Boss,I am a Crorepati

This post is in continuation of my This is India ! series (see here)

Here is a real life exchange

Friend:How much is the fare?

Auto Rickshaw Driver:50 Rs

Friend:What !This is hardly any distance.Take 20 Rs

Auto Rickshaw Driver:No

Friend:Ok-take 30 Rs

Auto Rickshaw Driver:Boss, I am a Crorepati.Have sold my land and got Crores from the Govt.I am driving this auto for timepass.If you want, I will drop you for free !

 

Apparently,lots of auto drivers in Navi Mumbai were local villagers who got Crores in compensation when their land was acquired.

Categories
This is India !

House razed when couple is away at work

This post belongs to This is India ! series (see here)

Usually, property disputes go to the court. But a couple was devastated to find their house in Kaveri Nagar in the city reduced to rubble on Monday.

P.P. Kumaramangalam (40) said a group of 20 men brought an excavator and illegally demolished his house allegedly in a bid to take over the 80 ft x 30 ft plot he had inherited from his father.

The demolition took place when his wife, Maya, who works as a nurse, was away at work and their 11-year-old son in school.

In supreme irony, the jurisdictional D.J. Police were present when the house was being bulldozed, but it turned out their role was confined to crowd control.

Mr. Kumaramangalam, a paramedic, was also at work when a neighbour called to say his house was being razed. By the time he rushed back, his home was gone and people were looting his belongings buried in the rubble. Everything the couple owned was gone: furniture, television, refrigerator, laptop and household articles.

When he confronted the demolition crew, he was assaulted, and when he tried to make a call on his mobile, one of the hired goons snatched the phone and gave it to a boy who ran away and disappeared into the crowd.

When Mr. Kumaramangalam went to the police station to file a complaint, the police refused to register a case, terming it a civil dispute. He then approached Police Commissioner Raghavendra H. Auradkar seeking help.-from Hindu